VeltrixDB Docs
v1.1.0 GitHub FAQ Quickstart

Limitations & Roadmap

These are real gaps in VeltrixDB today. We'd rather you know them upfront than discover them in production.

Honest limitations

Secondary-index metadata is node-local in replicated mode IDXCREATE/IDXDROP (index metadata) apply only on the node that receives them in replicated mode; raft mode replicates them. Workaround: in replicated mode, issue index create/drop against every node, or use raft mode when secondary indexes matter cluster-wide.
QUERY / RANGE / SCANCUR reads are node-local in cluster modes These read paths are always served from the receiving node's local data — they do not fan out across the cluster, so in raft/replicated modes their results reflect only what that node holds. Workaround: direct these operations at a node known to hold the relevant data, or fan out and merge client-side.
repl-ship: LWW conflict resolution only, and no back-pressure Cross-region shipping is durable across shipper restarts as of v1.1.0 (/admin/changes + --checkpoint), but two gaps remain: conflict resolution is last-write-wins only (it relies on the remote cluster's own version-vector deduplication), and there is no back-pressure signal to the source — local writes keep succeeding even while the destination is degraded or unreachable. Workaround: monitor destination lag and deadletter growth; design cross-region write patterns so LWW is acceptable. See Replication & CDC.
Raft is a single group All consensus traffic flows through one Raft group — a single log and a single leader — so raft mode does not scale writes horizontally: adding nodes adds fault tolerance and read capacity, not consensus write throughput. Workaround: use replicated mode when you need horizontally scaling writes without linearizability, or shard across multiple independent clusters at the application layer.
Replicated mode is not linearizable replicated mode is primary-copy replication for durability across copies; it has no single-writer ordering, so concurrent writers to the same key are not linearizable. Workaround: use raft mode instead when you need write linearizability; reserve replicated mode for durability-across-copies use cases with a single writer per key or where eventual consistency is acceptable. On the roadmap: not listed as a planned change — this is a deliberate architectural trade-off between the two modes, not a temporary gap.
No Redis protocol (RESP) You can't point a Redis client at VeltrixDB yet. Workaround: use VeltrixDB's own text protocol (nc-compatible) or one of the six native SDKs — the command surface (PUT/GET/DEL, atomic ops) is intentionally close to Redis's, so porting client code is mostly a find-and-replace. On the roadmap: yes — RESP compatibility is listed under "What's coming" in the changelog. Once it ships, migration will require only a connection-string change, not a code change.
No managed cloud offering VeltrixDB is self-hosted only today — there is no VeltrixDB Cloud or equivalent hosted SaaS. Workaround: deploy via the Helm chart or the Kubernetes Operator on your own cluster (GKE, EKS, AKS with local NVMe). On the roadmap: yes — a managed offering is explicitly listed as planned.

Shipped in v1.1.0

The following were listed as limitations before the v1.1.0 "distributed-completeness" release and are now implemented — they no longer belong on the list above:

What's coming

From the project changelog's "What's coming" section (items that shipped in v1.1.0 are listed above instead):

Track progress Follow GitHub Releases for updates on these items as they ship.